Verified answer

I agree women should do what they are best at and that is definitely not leading. America seriously ruined everything by allowing women to be men. Main reason so many problems today and especially relationship wise.

So there are a lot of rich countries where women in government as a porportion of the total is significantly higher compared to the U.S. Germany seems to be doing okay for itself and lets not forget Margaret Thatcher. The arguments against a woman in the white house are simply double standards upon further examination. Example: Steve Jobs was a tyrant; he pushed his people to their limits by yelling, screaming, micromanaging etc. Now imagine if a woman acted like that in the work place. "She is a *****; she is too emotional; shes bossy." I mean lets talk emotional. John Boener cries every time the camera is pointed to him. He cried on St.Patty's day last year.

You're entitled to your opinion. But I disagree. Women are capable for being great leaders, for example, Margaret Thatcher. They are individuals, some can be leaders some can't. You can't say all women can't be leaders. That is absurd.

Julia Gillard, former prime minister of Australia. She is loved by many, she was a great Prime minister. Other civilized countries have no problem with women being presidents, or prime ministers.

I'm going to go out on limb here and say you're not aware that women have the same ability to lead and prosper as men do. Yes, we are amazing at caring and teaching. But, to your surprise, we are also amazing at many other things, including leading. Women have been treated, for most of history, inferior to men. Considering that this is the 21st century and we have gotten quite a few things accomplished, I am very surprised you have such preconceived notions stuck to your mind. If you think men don't have a limit as to where they can prosper, do not put a boundary to a woman's abilities. Believe it or not women are more than capable to care and teach. Just way and see what we can do.

I think you mistake your wife as being the typical role model of women and how you feel they should all fit into life. Women are leaders of major civilized countries now and have been for quite some time - unless you are talking about the United States. They have shown no "womanly weakness" in performing their jobs. Some women are surely designed to be leaders and rise to that level in their lives. Women can be and are as ambitious, intelligent, and mentally tough as any man.

Hillary Clinton has been a leader for decades. She was a leader in the Senate, spearheading the fund to rebuild the WTC, and leading in the fight to make sure the first responders were properly cared for. She lead the entire State Department for four years. She's been a leader across the world for women's rights as well as here at home. She is what used to be called a "tough broad." She would fiercely defend this country when it is required. I'd hate to be Putin when she's sworn in and he decides to test her mettle; he's not going to be happy with the results.

Not all men are leaders, just as all women are not leaders. But there are many examples of notable leaders of both sexes.

Hey, if England, India, Germany, and so on, can have a woman leading than so can we! Women don't spend their whole life just raising babies and cooking dinner. We've ruled nations and served in armies right along with men throughout our worlds history.

Behind every good man THERE IS AN EVEN BETTER WOMAN ... and truth be told the most successful world leader this century is Germany's ANGELA MERKEL ... she's tough, she's smart and she is respected ... I'm sure that if the Germans [including their men] can cope why can't we ... ?

Imo, Hillary doesn't qualify as a woman....

she's much more like John McCain with lipstick......

It would be cool to have the first black president and the first woman president back to back

Not everyone hates women, but you're not alone