So far, I have seen female candidates campaign as if every woman on earth is on their side but in reality the room is dead quiet.
*cricket...cricket*
*rib-bit...rib-bit*
Do female candidates really do their research and reach out for the female votes or do they just jump onstage and assume that female voters will vote to bridge the R.E.S.P.E.C.T. gap?
Update:--
@ Caesars Tenth Legion--> Can you repeat that again, Hoss?
Copyright © 2024 Q2A.ES - All rights reserved.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
not as long as she's Nancy Pelosi...I damn sure wouldn't trust her!
always,
Ladyitch
p.s. it's like having an elephant in the room,,and it's wearing a pink flower in it's ear!
I honestly think it's the Men of the World that couldn't wrap their mind around the concept of a Woman as President...of the U.S.A.
it's been done in other areas of the World~ just not here,,, not yet!
I'd love to fill that position...For starters there wouldn't be any feet propped up on my Presidential desk!
Whoever gets the job could get the job because of the fact they have been judged by potential of the voters to be the main in advantageous condition for the placement. If a woman candidate had a concern with temper swings and so on hence of PMS, it may truthfully no longer circulate left out for the duration of her marketing campaign and so on. countless adult males have had temper swings in place of work. Any woman who can attain a "guy's international" of politics already is time-honored with the thank you to handle emotions and to reign them in as needed. The question may be a valid one, yet quite does no longer prepare in this type of difficulty. as an occasion to instruct my factor, one ought to argue that a woman should not be a doctor or an emergency room physician because of the fact if she had PMS at some point, it ought to value somebody their life. What if a woman substitute right into a chemist for a considerable pharmaceutical company that regulate into doing drug trials on volunteers? assume the female had a PMS 2d and used purely a sprint too a lot of a definite chemical. it could have disastrous consequences. I advise, this good judgment quite isn't logical. PMS isn't the priority here. many females have it and countless females do no longer. I for one have never had it. At difficulty it is how a woman OR a guy, handles stress and changing circumstances, inclusive of ways they are feeling on a particular day, and different components that would impact their point of stress. If a guy or woman is able to deal with stress in a calm and expert way, then that must be a hallmark that they could a minimum of be honest to no longer push the pink button in the event that they have been President.
I'm not a woman, but I haven't seen a reasonable candidate for president that is a woman. It has nothing to do with their sex, but rather the lack of a centrist candidate. Does anyone want Palin or Bachmann (Tea Party/Republican) or Hillary Clinton (Democrat) to run the country? Yikes!
no I trust a man more because usually I think of the President being there to protect the country and I wouldn't feel as safe if a woman was Pres.
but I'd give a woman candidate a chance of course, that'd be awesome to have. just don't mention SP
I'm a women and I have difficulty trusting anyone as president.
I live in Australia, and my prime minister's female, but I don't trust her one bit. Not because of feminism or anything, something to do with a carbon tax. Gender is irrelevant
call me crazy but gender doesn't affect my opinion of a politician. i judge only based on their opinions and political standpoint.
edit: most of europe has had female presidents/prime ministers and they've done a pretty good job.
Look at Sarah Palin now.
Woman usually back stab each other
Never seen one who I'd thought would be a good president...But if I do, of course, why not?
i would as long as she was a good candidate