Verified answer

Assuming you're referring to the Chiefs, I consider it to be a good record. You have to look at the circumstances for which they've been playing this season. They have by far the most injuries in the NFL and have faced stiff competition throughout the season. I consider them to be the most underrated team in the league, and I expect them to be next season's dark horse. I'll definitely be rooting for them, because I have a lot of respect for the team and their fans, even more-so considering the fact that they managed to beat the Packers yet remain classy about it.

Like I said to someone a while ago, the only thing that they're missing is one more high level draft pick and Asclepius.

BQ: Yes, I find it reasonable.

I'm going to say that a record is only bad if it doesn't land you a playoff birth. Seattle last year had a worse record(8-8 I think?) than some teams who didn't make the playoffs(Tampa bay was 10-6 i think) and they surprised the Saints with a first round win.

Um I say the Chiefs will probably be the best team in their division next year if any decent quarterback(no matter orton or cassel) and if Jamaal Charles stays healthy.

All magnificent possibilities.the only with the terrific threat of being broken is Dimaggio's consecutive video games with a fulfillment streak.That one you basically might desire to be fortunate. indexed below are some greater to contemplate: Walter Johnson's 113 profession shutouts.no person interior the final 50 years has greater effective than 60. maximum pitchers do not even get 113 wins of their finished careers. Hack Wilson's 191 RBIs in a season and he did it in a 154 sport time table.The A.L. checklist is 184 by utilising Lou Gehrig and that one is untouchable too. that's my fashionable stat which i think of is remarkable.Jim Palmer the HOF pitcher for The Baltimore Orioles pitched for 17 years had over 270 profession wins,gained 20 or greater video games in a season 8 cases and not as quickly as did he ever supply up a Grand Slam homerun. it extremely is troublesome to think of that he in no way had a bases loaded situation so this stat merits point out.

It's a losing record, so no one should be happy about it, but the Chiefs held together and found away to fight out the season and finish strong, so I wouldn't be too upset. They had lots of injuries this year.

BQ: I have no clue. It's way too early to even think about that yet. Just because a team looks good on paper doesn't mean they'll have a great season. It's too early to predict next season.

I'd say anywhere from 6-10 to 8-8 is decent, but not terrible.

BQ: Honestly anything is possible in the AFC West.

YES, because it means you lost more than you win. 8-8 ain't a hell of a lot better. Personally, 10-6 would be the minimum I would call a good record.

it's not a good record. thats for sure. I don't think Kansas city will make the playoffs, but who knows? We don't know what moves they will make in off season and who they might sign.

a team that went 10-6 last year i would say it is bad but like denver that went 3-13 last year and finish 8-8 this year i would say it is

They lost Eric barry, Jamaal Charles, matt cassell, and tony moeaki and still fought til the end, they'll definitely make it next year.