Halo has progressively gotten worse from game to game. I loved Halo CE, 2, and 3, but I can't stand Reach. I loved the BR, and Carbine more than any weapon in Reach.
As far as CoD, I don't think it is a very quality game. UMP/Rangers got me a 2.2 Kill Death in SnD, but that game is ez.
i like both equally they offer different things like halo levels the field because everyone has the same guns
while cod allows you to upgrade weapons as you get further along in the game
i like the br because it shoots 3 and kills in 3 headshots while the dmr shoots one and kills in 4-5 headshots
and the nr and carbine are in seperate categories because the nr shots explode after enough shots and the carbine shoots faster, so they will probably kill at the same rate on an unexperienced person but because the carbine can shoot faster it will probably kill faster with someone who has a quick trigger finger like i do
my favorite primary is the aug hbar with the handle and red dot and my favorite secondary is the aa-12 because it shoots fast so if you suddenly get ambushed you can shoot faster and have a better chance of killing nd attach the handle and red dot and youre set
but if i cant use the hbar the next bet would be the famas or the m16
and if you can only use one attachment i would suggest the red dot for the hbar and the handle for the aa-12
My opinion is starting to change, I hated halo 3 and loved cod 4 and WaW but then modern warfare 2 came out and I thought it was complete crap and black ops is starting to look the same way, meanwhile halo reach came out and I feel like they fixed every problem I had in 3 so I would say halo more then CoD.
i hate it when nerds ***** about which one is better. THey are both great, and they both have great aspects to them. I love halos story, and Cods multiplayer. But i guess halo doesnt have n00b-tubing fags or m16 whores....
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
Halo has progressively gotten worse from game to game. I loved Halo CE, 2, and 3, but I can't stand Reach. I loved the BR, and Carbine more than any weapon in Reach.
As far as CoD, I don't think it is a very quality game. UMP/Rangers got me a 2.2 Kill Death in SnD, but that game is ez.
i like both equally they offer different things like halo levels the field because everyone has the same guns
while cod allows you to upgrade weapons as you get further along in the game
i like the br because it shoots 3 and kills in 3 headshots while the dmr shoots one and kills in 4-5 headshots
and the nr and carbine are in seperate categories because the nr shots explode after enough shots and the carbine shoots faster, so they will probably kill at the same rate on an unexperienced person but because the carbine can shoot faster it will probably kill faster with someone who has a quick trigger finger like i do
my favorite primary is the aug hbar with the handle and red dot and my favorite secondary is the aa-12 because it shoots fast so if you suddenly get ambushed you can shoot faster and have a better chance of killing nd attach the handle and red dot and youre set
but if i cant use the hbar the next bet would be the famas or the m16
and if you can only use one attachment i would suggest the red dot for the hbar and the handle for the aa-12
My opinion is starting to change, I hated halo 3 and loved cod 4 and WaW but then modern warfare 2 came out and I thought it was complete crap and black ops is starting to look the same way, meanwhile halo reach came out and I feel like they fixed every problem I had in 3 so I would say halo more then CoD.
But I would put bad company 2 above both of them
Both are overrated (not that overrated means bad), but I prefer Halo.
BQ1: BR (bloom sucks) and NR
BQ2: SCAR-H/TAR/FAL and G18/.44 Magnum
i hate it when nerds ***** about which one is better. THey are both great, and they both have great aspects to them. I love halos story, and Cods multiplayer. But i guess halo doesnt have n00b-tubing fags or m16 whores....
COOOOOOD <3
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AmGpw...
Call of Duty FTW
COD
1-COD
2-Halo