Verified answer

No. The bill needs to be scrapped. They shouldn't even start over without the input of the Republicans or they're not going to get anything passed (because they'll have to take credit should it become a massive failure).

Lieberman is a jerk. His goal is to represent the interests of the insurance companies to the best of his ability.

He may, however, have done the Democrats a favor. The Senate bill is a mess. There has been entirely too much compromise. The Democrats should follow Howard Dean's suggestion -- "kill the Senate bill, go back to the House, start the reconciliation process, where you only need 51 votes."

If even one-0.5 of the GOP individuals who choose for "compromise" might connect with the Democrats who're so prone, there may be a relentless and stable majority for paying for issues completed that serve the desires and the hobbies of the yankee human beings. as much as i admire and savor bill Clinton, he compromised too plenty, for my area, and went against his very own concepts on the Welfare Reform that ended up contributing to my daughter's wrongful dying in 2002. on the present undertaking of allowing the fee selection-busting deficit-inflicting tax cuts for the wealthiest 2% of people to run out, the only area obtainable compromise would desire to be the $250,000 cut back-off ingredient, which would be raised to in keeping with threat $350,000 a twelve months in earnings until eventually now the Clinton-twelve months point of 39% kicks in. After convincing the balloting public (wisely) that the U.S. monetary device won't be able to have the money for the tax cuts to be prolonged or made everlasting (that would upload a minimum of $700 BILLION to the already-to-extreme Republican-led to deficit!...), President Obama shouldn't now renege and compromise on something however the typical carry contained in the cutoff ingredient or he runs the very genuine possibility of finding like a WIMP! the yankee human beings choose for potential in our leaders! we'd like President Obama to stand ON concept! So in this tax cut back expiration on my own, I prefer disagreement. on the hot commence Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty with Russia, I prefer regardless of compromise is critical (interior of principled regulations) to get this international-keeping Treaty ratified.

Yes.

Because with a government dominated by just two political parties, both on opposite ends of the political spectrum, its either compromise or no action whatsoever.

Where were you during Civics class friend? Compromise is what this country is built on. The bill still has good things attached, like no more preexisting conditions, no more lifetime caps, etc. I would like it to have the public option, but that can come later.

I support working together to find solutions that both agree on, not grudgingly accepting losses for gains.

Maybe it's too much to ask, considering how much money and interest is at stake. But a government that wasn't run by 300 million drooling retard Americans wouldn't have much problem with it.

Democrats and Republicans - Protecting Big Business while giving the finger to normal citizens.

No, we have to be complete idiots to compromise with the idiots that brought us into bankruptcy. If someone bankrupted your business, would you take any advice from that moran. What is Obama doing compromising with failed policies of the Republicans.

No. If I wanted a Republican agenda to be enacted, then I would have voted for Republicans.