Verified answer

i do but at an extent, I'm a gun enthusiast, i love the M16 rifles and im hoping to own one soon, but as these gun control laws become stricter, and begin banning assault weapons again then i would not be able to own my dream gun! i have my OWN reasons to own guns!

I own guns and that i do not help gun administration regulations. the in basic terms guns managed by ability of those idiotic products of legislations are criminal guns. maximum were handed to outlaw an action that became already unlawful. operating example: a guy entered a school backyard and began capturing little ones with a semi-computerized rifle. The reaction became to outlaw semi-computerized rifles. Does that mean that getting right into a school backyard and killing little ones with a semi-computerized rifle became criminal beforehand the recent regulation became enacted? i do not imagine so. Criminals, by ability of definition, do not obey the regulation. So how contained in the international does passing yet another regulation do some thing functional? the 2d modification ends with the words "shall not be infringed". meaning constrained or made better complicated. in basic terms a very naive man or woman should be made to believe criminals should be managed with regulations. It calls for police, jails, prisons, and execution chambers. A killing spree is ended perpetually on the great of needle. at the same time as the american public is disarmed, and it truly is going to take position, will you worry the criminal, the police or the military the most. "detect and confiscate all privately owned firearms". A position elementary to Hitler, and Stalin, see how nicely that worked for the individuals. it is a very open ended question. deliver your e-mail to my profile and that i'll provide better once you've an activity. very last idea: An armed guy is a citizen, an unarmed guy is a topic, and a disarmed guy is a prisoner.

heck no. think about it this way. if a shooter goes in to a public building, knowing no one in there had a gun, how many would he kill? A lot of people.

However, if everyone who owns property also owns a gun, then a lot of people in that building would have their guns with them and even if the shooter still went in there knowing this, he would not get very far.

even if guns are taken away completely, if someone wants to kill, they will find a way to kill. guns don't kill people, people kill people.

To some extent. I think people should have guns but not like military weapons.

only to an extent because gun control wont solve everything. Those who really want guns will just buy it illegally

i do because the only thing that you really need a gun for is hunting and in an absolute emergency and it's not like you need an assault rifle to kill a deer

Hell no. I own so many guns,I'm even going to get a 50 cal machine gun.

yes

although it may sound like socialism, its not.

Its protecting other citizens and kindergartners less then the age of 10 dying.

Sandy hook was sad

Support something means paying for it.