Verified answer

This is the true effects of climate change

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AuLZU...

Yet people are ignoring such warning given as these given well over 2 months ago.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Aj81I...

And in that time many natural disasters have come about and will continue to do in the future

funny statement you made, "... with floods and BLIZZARDS... why don't people believe in global-WARMING..." perhaps because most people have enough common sense to see for themselves that man-induced global warming is nothing more the a scam promoted by elitists interested in acquiring lots of money from the naive.

You answered your own question. It is hard to push global warming when the planet is experiencing blizzards, where the primary "scientists" that promoted the scam were found to be frauds, and when the so called science was also found to be fraudulent.

Now instead of promoting junk science designed to make a small number of elitists extremely rich (Al Gore is worth over a 100 million now), perhaps you should focus your energy on real problems like clean water, clean air and poverty. Those are indeed honorable causes. Man-induced global warming is nothing more then political fraud.

The world goes through it's own changes, cooling/warming. What it actually is, is a form of terrorism (so to speak) not in the sense of bombings but in the sense of scare tactics. It is BIG BUSINESS full of lies as most things government tell us. Yes we should recycle and put our garbage in garbage cans. The problem is, it has gone to far now, point of no return. To now say that global warming does not exist would mean tens of millions of people would be out of work. It's like cancer research, yes people do overcome cancers and i am very glad of that, but if they did find a cure (which I am sure they have) think of all the money that would stop coming into the Pharmaceutical companies coffers.

We are in a sorry state of affairs because of this.

Is this the first time there has been flooding? Wait til spring when all that snow melts in the mid-west and the Mississippi River goes over it's backs again. Flooding is nothing new. It reminds me of Katrina in 2005. The following year they were predicting a very active hurricane season but it didn't happen. Could it be the global weather has to many variables to accurately predict?

first global-warming was named wrong on purpose, it should have been named global-deinsulation. who will believe that warming would cause blizzards, sometimes really smart people refuse to change somethings name because it's named before the effects are known. autism is an excelant example, there are many kinds and no real cause or cure but without a name no one can market treatment. also many of the worlds leaders are half dead, why buy a 30 year warranty on a car you will have for 10 years. the next generation is of no concern to them. hopefully it is to you as it is to me. good luck

i feel the issue is or has been hijacked by radicals on both sides of the argument ,the truth is usually some where in between,eg Himalayan glaciers were reported to be gone by 2035 but the scientists who studied this actually said 2350 now this gave the anti gw people some fuel for there fire but instead of pointing out the mistake they ran with the idea that it is all propaganda and gw is just a fraud .the deniers have an agenda as do the believers and there is us we just want the truth but because of fools on both sides the truth is blurred and twisted to our view

easily do i care approximately international warming. this way of excellent form of human beings say that it incredibly is largely component of the earth's organic cycle. it is not. we are inflicting it. some issues you're able to do are... a million= recycle papers and plastics one after the different 2= Plant a tree 3= develop funds for a community international warming affiliation 4= use the different ingredient of a bite of paper in case you're making a mistake (Saves timber) 5=Take shorter showers 6= do not depart the water on on an analogous time as brushing your tooth 7=do not muddle (throw out your rubbish and recycle papers) Theres extra! seek it on google and you shold get a bunch of lists of what you're able to do to help provide up international warming. reliable success, and bypass green! =]

In truth most people care. This site is a gathering place for wise knowitall, know nothing, people, but don't let them fool you. But even those people in here are being exposed to it, whether the believe it or not and eventually their consciences will get to them.

Instead, look at whats going on in the real world. More and more people are aware of the issue. Most of the world backs the the issue. The US is only 5% of the world population and we use up 20% of the worlds energy so we're spoiled and want our toys. But still most in the US care and we are starting to do something. The government cares. Most big companies care.

The hoax of global warming has nothing to do with blizzards.

And with the multitudes of liars we've had droning on about global warming, the data that have proven them as such, the exposure of the political agenda and fraud...........you can't blame people for not giving a rats (_I_).

In the 70's we had old coal plants causing acid rain due to the sulfur dioxide they gave off. There was alot of OBVIOUS enviromental distruction. Simple cause and effect.

Where is the OBVIOUS effect ?

The polar bears aren't drowning.........that was a lie.

The hockeyStick graph was shown to be a lie too.

The 2007 IPCC report has been exposed for having many inaccuracies and so called "studies" were exaggerated and were nothing more than interviews.

We witnessed ClimateGate and the manipulation of data by scientists.

We've seen that only 130 years of temp data exists and its been largely inaccurate due to no one keeping the temp stations to the standards they were supposed to be kept to.

There's been no warming for 15 years, but common sense would tell us that since man kinds hasn't stopped emitting CO2 that according to the 'greenhouse' effect we should have been warming all the time.

Hansen at Nasa has been a politically influenced hack.

Even the NOAA says its not Co2 but its the water vapor in the stratosphere.

http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/20100128_...

The Kyoto accord was a fraud

http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2010/10...

Cyclone activity never increased

http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/~maue/tropical/

There was no "consent" to global warming........that was a lie too.

So tell me, just how dense does a person have to be to overlook this mountain of evidence, mountain of REAL data, mountain of liars and politically agenda'd to still believe in global warming ?

I realize you've probably wasted your life by jumping on someone elses bandwagon and believed in a fraud, but get with the program and learn a little

Actually, a lot of us care about protecting the environment and doing our part to keep it clean. There is a large difference between doing that and believing that man is causing us to come out of a cool period back to more normal temperatures.