Basically it's because even though the suggestion is that money is neutral, it allows for 'real', and 'nominal' pricing, which literally means, actual-price, or 'experienced-price'.
Allowing for speculation, and manipulation of pricing within the dichotomy.
Is it higher to have your whole money taken or have certainly not had any cash? Would you/me/someone be frightened of being rich if it required a bit of threat? A personal funding? Is it valued at having/discovering "A pleasing return or outcome" in whatever? Or just giving up and admitting you're beat earlier than you ? Love will not be a Division into two in most cases contradictory parts or opinions. Is it? Is not it some thing a bit of different than that?
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
This should probably be in economics.
Basically it's because even though the suggestion is that money is neutral, it allows for 'real', and 'nominal' pricing, which literally means, actual-price, or 'experienced-price'.
Allowing for speculation, and manipulation of pricing within the dichotomy.
Is it higher to have your whole money taken or have certainly not had any cash? Would you/me/someone be frightened of being rich if it required a bit of threat? A personal funding? Is it valued at having/discovering "A pleasing return or outcome" in whatever? Or just giving up and admitting you're beat earlier than you ? Love will not be a Division into two in most cases contradictory parts or opinions. Is it? Is not it some thing a bit of different than that?