Verified answer

No.

And for onlymatch4u, bad movie. I'm an actual biologist. You people seem to forget that.

Evidence for evolution, specifically the common ancestor of humans and other apes and primates.

Chromosome 2 fusion event.

L-gulonolactone oxidase pseudogene

Endogenous retroviral insertion events

Ect.

All indisputable molecular evidence. None of which you are going to understand. There's no real debate possible, just a scientifically illiterate liar constantly being corrected and never learning anything.

extremely effective, as various the previous respondents have shown. issues could be greater perfect if all that huge help to Israel replace into decrease off. help could desire to flow to those in want, which includes Palestinian refugees and different oppressed human beings of the international, to not an apartheid state. The grotesquely biased ideas-set of the rustic in the direction of the middle east is the final reason that the two Israel and the rustic are between the main hated international places of the international on the instant.

How should we know? What difference does it make? Many scientists are skeptics and do not believe in a higher power. On the other hand, other scientists and many (most?) medical professionals do, and believe that understanding science and believing in God are not mutually exclusive. I happen to be in that group, and to believe that our talents and resources were given to us to develop fully so as to help ourselves and others. Hence the strong support of medical science (including vaccinations) among people of faith. There are some exceptions, but they are rare.

That is my personal belief. If others feel differently, it does not concern or offend me in any way.

And what's that got to do with anything?

I have a personal policy not to "believe" in anything. So, no.

Weise Ente is a scientist. "Believe" is a very strange word to scientists. So highly unlikely.

Edit: And they get so much wrong in so few words. When they start comparing modern medicine to religion, there really is no point.

Science requires evidence; religion is belief in something despite evidence.

Edit: "I would be very willing to debate either of those two people you mentioned on that subject"

Given your demonstrably poor understanding of basic science, it really wouldn't be much of a debate.

You don't debate cranks; it just legitimizes them. Such people should be ridiculed at every opportunity.

Weise Ente is a research assistant and Rhianna is focused primarily on vaccine issues, so I suspect she is not going to do her homework on God. She states here that "Science" is somehow not related to religion, but she is not considering that most of Science today is based on assumptions, not facts. I would imagine, but don't know, that she believes humans came from a creature that gave rise to apes and man, and that life began in some primordial soup billions of years ago. If she does, I'd like to see her proof backed by scientific facts, not assumptions. Evolution beyond speciation is based on assumptions, not facts. If she or Wise has any facts to back their beliefs up, it would be very interesting to see those facts.

In reality things like the speed of light that has been touted in most science books as a constant has been proven to be anything but a constant and this has put in question Einstein's theory E=mc2. I would be very willing to debate either of those two people you mentioned on that subject. I highly suspect they know very little about either science or religion.

EDIT: Looks like unless the debate has to do with POISON INJECTIONS, hiding under a rock is preferred. So it is better to criticize the messenger than taking a chance of exposing your ignorance is the "Phrase of the day" I see.

good luck to you

They are strict adherents to the religion of modern medicine and are priests in the temple of doom.

If they did, what would that mean?