Justify Complete Atheism?

I can accept non-belief of most of the gods our society has, however I cannot accept the idea of 100% atheism, the believe that there are no gods, whatsoever.

Until we reach the technological level where we can understand everything about our universe in it's entirety (perhaps becoming Gods ourselves?), there is no way to say for sure that there isn't a god somewhere, having some inflence over some part of the universe.

There are still even parts of our own local world that are not completely nailed down by science, such as global weather patterns. Any sane meteorologist will tell you there is no way to absolutely predict the weather, especially over periods any longer than a few days. For all we know now, there could be a weather god subtlely influencing it all.

What reasoning can you give that gets around this problem of us not having complete knowledge?

Update:

Sorry, I was a little tired when I made the initial question. To clarify:

I'm agnostic. I don't currently believe in any gods. But you could have figured that out from the first sentence of my question. So you wasted your time with all that speil about gaps.

I want you to tell me how you can know with absolute certainty that there is no god of any sort anywhere, so as to justify your atheism as opposed to being an agnostic.

"I havn't seen any evidence of a god yet so there are no gods" is an inductive argument, and therefore a load of rubbish.

Please enter comments
Please enter your name.
Please enter the correct email address.
You must agree before submitting.

Answers & Comments


Helpful Social

Copyright © 2024 Q2A.ES - All rights reserved.