Verified answer

1) My understanding is that Haliburton was awarded a contract under a new streamlined procedure which allows for expedited decisions, in the event of war, etc. So there was not the typical bidding procedure.

I also understand that Haliburton was NOT the low bidder on a contract during the Clinton era, but it was awarded to them anyway. Oftentimes one has to look at everything about a bid - competence, not just price.

John Edwards, Kerry's running mate, was asked during the 2004 election whether a Kerry administration would stop using Haliburton. He refused to say they would cease doing so.

I would be interested in seeing Haliburton's stock performance over the past six years. that may indicete best whether war has been "good for business" for them.

2) I believe that like many executives (rightly or wrongly), Cheney received a huge retirement package when he left the company. for tax reasons, it is being paid over time, but there is no possible variation in the payment amount. He receives the same amount no matter how the company does. He's resigned his job and they are not currently paying him. Whatever he is owed is just being deferred. I suppose if the compay goes bankrupt he would not get the remaining money, unless they have set up some kind of annuity.

I suppose they could hire Cheney back any time if they wanted to. There may be laws preventing people from going right from the government to business. If not, maybe there should be.

1 - Essentially, yes.

2 - Dunno (and, if true, I don't find it particularly significant).

As a point of interest, Halliburton's first no-bid contract was awarded during Bill Clinton's administration in response to requests by the military services that they not have to deal with thousands (yes, thousands!) of contractors.

It was one of the military's answers to the requirement that they reduce costs. The idea was that fewer contractors to manage meant fewer military buildings filled with military contract managers pushing paper.

nicely, technically.... the best tale grow to be a conspiracy theory. the form grow to be conspired no remember what. yet, the govt.s theory is that Al-Qeada did it. it incredibly is in basic terms a theory by way of fact even the FBI claims to no longer have sufficient information to make a conviction. i ask your self how they developed this concept (which grow to be released on 9/12/01) without the income of an learn. in fact, the best learn did no longer even start up until eventually 11/02; AFTER the excellent crime scene grow to be wiped sparkling up and shipped off in a boat to China. are you able to think of? whilst grow to be the final time any good enterprise wiped sparkling up the crime scene beforehand of their learn? and found a to blame occasion the day after the crime? IF this does not ring absurd to you, then you definately are becoming fallen sufferer to the corporate/government-owned mainstream media propaganda.

1) True, Bechtel was excluded at the last minute

2) Don't know but Halliburton can hire any one they want.

1) true

2) He still owns stock. Will he return? If he wants to. He won't need the money.

Find best solutions