Verified answer

Obama is president for 4 more years. No one really wins the debates but if someone "won", Obama won all three. I love our president... Anyways, on their viewpoints, Obama supports gay marriage, abortion rights, and he has a plan for the economy that will work, which includes taxing the rich more to have a more productive middle class. Romney is known to flip-flop but his most recent views are that gay marriage shouldnt be allowed at all, that abortion shouldnt be allowed even in situations such as rape and incest, and he has an economic plan that is kind of secretive and we dont know much about, and he wants rich people to pay no taxes... Its pretty obvious why Obama won the election.

to respond to your question, there is not any longer something combating any self sufficient candidate from inviting the democratic and republican nominee to a televised debate. it would opt to be prepared via the independant nonetheless because of the fact the networks usually want the two the democratic or republican candidate. If I submit to in concepts wisely, Ross Perot controlled to get in a three-way debate while he replaced into working, that's unusual. even nonetheless that's finished if the candidate persists! And via the way, there's no ethic saying presidential debates are nonpartisan, or perhaps if so human beings might nonetheless comprehend who's with what occasion and it would impact their assessment of the talk (regrettably). stable question!

to respond to your question, there is not any longer something scuffling with any self sustaining candidate from inviting the democratic and republican nominee to a televised debate. it may desire to be prepared by utilising the independant regardless of the incontrovertible fact that as a results of fact the networks usually prefer the two the democratic or republican candidate. If I bear in mind properly, Ross Perot controlled to get in a three-way debate whilst he grew to become into working, it is unusual. regardless of the undeniable fact that it is completed if the candidate persists! And by utilising the way, there is not any ethic asserting presidential debates are nonpartisan, or maybe if so human beings could nevertheless know who's with what occasion and it may impression their assessment of the talk (regrettably). stable question!