Verified answer

We,, how they portrayed jane's father. In the book it gave me the sense that he was different, i really don't know how to explain it, but it didn't look like the one in the movie. Second, in the books they weren't that poor, in the movie, we see jane with the chickens and acting like a poor, when in the books , we never see her doing any of this.

whats up, i will grant you credit for appreciating Jane Austen's artwork. despite if, you look to appreciate little approximately literature many times. there is not any actual thank you to examine "delight and Prejudice" with a waste of paper like "Twilight". the only ingredient they have in difficulty-unfastened is that the two contain a love tale. yet something - good heavens, woman! delight and Prejudice has a style of writing that's merely incomparable to the wordy loss of style that this stupid different novel has. Then there's a plot. there is character progression. There are literary instruments - all 3 of them issues that Stephenie Meyer has by no ability heard of! heavily. in case you like Twilight, common adequate, it is as much as your self. yet to examine it with Jane Austen? that's criminally abusive. Cheers S

how well the music in the different parts portrays the tone of Austen and the mood during the same parts min the novel