Perry because his record is unparalleled. Texas has been an economic powerhouse throughout all of Bush's and Obama's presidencies. Perry's been governor throughout all of that time. As far as I'm concerned, that's enough.
Dr. Carson, because that man talks tremendous sense, he's experienced in being an executive, he's a retired neurosurgeon with some impressive accomplishments, he's seems to carry a deep pride in the fundamental values of this nation, he carries a healthy fear of what could become of this nation if we continue on this path, and he's not so stupid and naive as half this nation is to assume that we could never become a horrifically oppressive dictatorship.
Cain because he's the only one that comes in with a core-plan right from the start, a flat-tax plan that he will obviously develop if had won the presidency. He's experienced in an executive position, co-owned a very successful franchise, God Father's Pizza, that I enjoyed growing up.
And probably the most important reason I like Cain is that the Democrats were so scared of his nomination, that they orchestrated attacks on him like he was Palin, and started to scratch for every little nonsensical thing they could till they found a few women that he had known professionally that they could pay to publicly accuse him of sexual misconduct. Of course, the accusations went nowhere, and they stopped once he was no longer a potential threat to the Democrats.
Whenever the Democrats demonstrate that they are scared of a Republican like that, and they have absolutely nothing substantial, and therefore are forced to throw nonsense at me to convince me to not support the Republican, that Republican catches my attention as someone I would probably want in the White House.
In fact, I wouldn't have even known that Palin was more than a rhino like McCain if the left had not attacked her with every nonsensical thing they could find.
It's also one of the things that lost respect for liberals for me. I can't take a liberal seriously anymore because of how they think of Palin. All the left ever used was unsubstantial nonsense against Palin, things that didn't even matter, little things like an expensive dress at the national convention. It was ridiculous what they used to smear Palin. Anyone with any kind of intelligence would see how ridiculous it was that which they used against Palin, but liberals just eat it up like it actually means something. Liberals to this day think Tina Fey is Palin. That's literally how stupid the common liberal is.
I have such a difficult time taking anything a liberal says as something that was gotten from intelligent rational thought because most of what they say comes from nonsense, rhetoric, even fabrications. Liberals follow the words of comedians like Stewart and Colbert, and even Family Guy. It's just absurd. It's literally like liberals must fight away the compulsion to think for themselves to literally be that stupid.
I like Mike Huckabee and Ben Carson but I don't know if Ben Carson has the resources and maybe he'd be a good VP candidate with someone like Huckabee at the top of the ticket.
I like Chris Christie but I think the bridge scandal showed he had a mean side to him unless it was all political BS. I also like Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan.
I don't get as good a feeling about Rick Perry (he is arrogant) and Rand Paul is too far out there.
1) Bush v. Gore was a major screw-up, a terrible decision, motivated by party loyalty, and nothing like it must ever happen again,
2) That the Republican Presidents of the past 45 years who have spoken about wanting to appoint Justices who would render their decisions objectively were hypocrites,
3) It is time to finally live up to the insincere promises of the past to appoint people to the Court who are TRULY going to be the most HIGHLY OBJECTIVE interpreters of law that can be found anywhere in the country.
My choice would be Darrell Issa and Michelle Bachmann. Seriously, the GOP is aware that they can not win if Hillary decides to run for president, because they do not a suitable candidate.
Answers & Comments
Perry, Carson, or Cain.
Perry because his record is unparalleled. Texas has been an economic powerhouse throughout all of Bush's and Obama's presidencies. Perry's been governor throughout all of that time. As far as I'm concerned, that's enough.
Dr. Carson, because that man talks tremendous sense, he's experienced in being an executive, he's a retired neurosurgeon with some impressive accomplishments, he's seems to carry a deep pride in the fundamental values of this nation, he carries a healthy fear of what could become of this nation if we continue on this path, and he's not so stupid and naive as half this nation is to assume that we could never become a horrifically oppressive dictatorship.
Cain because he's the only one that comes in with a core-plan right from the start, a flat-tax plan that he will obviously develop if had won the presidency. He's experienced in an executive position, co-owned a very successful franchise, God Father's Pizza, that I enjoyed growing up.
And probably the most important reason I like Cain is that the Democrats were so scared of his nomination, that they orchestrated attacks on him like he was Palin, and started to scratch for every little nonsensical thing they could till they found a few women that he had known professionally that they could pay to publicly accuse him of sexual misconduct. Of course, the accusations went nowhere, and they stopped once he was no longer a potential threat to the Democrats.
Whenever the Democrats demonstrate that they are scared of a Republican like that, and they have absolutely nothing substantial, and therefore are forced to throw nonsense at me to convince me to not support the Republican, that Republican catches my attention as someone I would probably want in the White House.
In fact, I wouldn't have even known that Palin was more than a rhino like McCain if the left had not attacked her with every nonsensical thing they could find.
It's also one of the things that lost respect for liberals for me. I can't take a liberal seriously anymore because of how they think of Palin. All the left ever used was unsubstantial nonsense against Palin, things that didn't even matter, little things like an expensive dress at the national convention. It was ridiculous what they used to smear Palin. Anyone with any kind of intelligence would see how ridiculous it was that which they used against Palin, but liberals just eat it up like it actually means something. Liberals to this day think Tina Fey is Palin. That's literally how stupid the common liberal is.
I have such a difficult time taking anything a liberal says as something that was gotten from intelligent rational thought because most of what they say comes from nonsense, rhetoric, even fabrications. Liberals follow the words of comedians like Stewart and Colbert, and even Family Guy. It's just absurd. It's literally like liberals must fight away the compulsion to think for themselves to literally be that stupid.
I like Mike Huckabee and Ben Carson but I don't know if Ben Carson has the resources and maybe he'd be a good VP candidate with someone like Huckabee at the top of the ticket.
I like Chris Christie but I think the bridge scandal showed he had a mean side to him unless it was all political BS. I also like Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan.
I don't get as good a feeling about Rick Perry (he is arrogant) and Rand Paul is too far out there.
Somebody who admits:
1) Bush v. Gore was a major screw-up, a terrible decision, motivated by party loyalty, and nothing like it must ever happen again,
2) That the Republican Presidents of the past 45 years who have spoken about wanting to appoint Justices who would render their decisions objectively were hypocrites,
3) It is time to finally live up to the insincere promises of the past to appoint people to the Court who are TRULY going to be the most HIGHLY OBJECTIVE interpreters of law that can be found anywhere in the country.
My choice would be Darrell Issa and Michelle Bachmann. Seriously, the GOP is aware that they can not win if Hillary decides to run for president, because they do not a suitable candidate.
Honestly........the only one who could even mix it up a WEE bit, would be Chris Christie.
All the Others are cookie cutter azzclowns......and don't stand a chance.
Christie would at least make it a LITTLE interesting.
A double header, any combination of:
Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann.
Meg Whitman seems to think she can win if the GOP picks her to run against Hilary Clinton.
Who knows, Hillary has already been chosen to be the next president. We don't elect nothin.
Can they find a Mexican/Panamanian Eskimo who used his fathers government contracts to get ahead?....He would be PERFECT!
MY choice would be Condoleeza Rice!