They get perplexed b/c the guy mowing their backyard is termed Jesus. particularly, the confusion happens whilst some dufus who's by no ability afflicted to truthfully study the Bible mixes the judgmental psycho deity of the OT with the NT character of Jesus. they're going to say issues like 'the OT now no longer counts' then turn proper around and quote Leviticus on their interpretation of what Leviticus says approximately homosexuality. None look to comprehend that the sole factor Jesus himself says is undesirable, is divorce. The Corinthians quote that lists homosexuality alongside with divorce and promiscuity as a sin? which would be Paul. @ hassle-unfastened, newsflash, some people don't have a cloak Matthew 19:21 'in case you prefer to be proper, sell your issues and supply them to the adverse' @ spider boy, are you truthfully daft sufficient to think of the conflict with Iran became into shielding? The conflict with Afghanistan is often argued that it became into preemptive, no longer shielding. @ jim, are you touching on the OT verse, an eye fixed for an eye fixed, a tooth for a tooth? as I reported... eye roll @ enormous one, you're one to be talking approximately twisting scripture @ michael d, for the reason which you haven't any longer something of any interest to make a contribution, you attack the questioner...you should save on with your very own advice and basically no longer answer @ cate, I do savor R. Paul's stance on no longer interfering yet he additionally needs to eliminate social welfare classes...that is not very 'professional-existence' to tension a financially or mentally careworn man or woman to have a new child and then refuse to help it out in existence. @ anthony, awaken...jesus reported no longer something approximately homosexuality or abortion...those words weren't even invented yet!
The best passage from the Bible on that subject, since Jesus didn't address it directly, is John the Baptist telling a Roman soldier to treat his enemy fairly. He did not tell the Roman soldier to get out of the army.
Why do you ask only republicans? Democrats are also christians and Democrats are also war mongers. Just look at past wars and conflicts we have been in
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
Jesus was pro-war on condition of Congress authorization
They get perplexed b/c the guy mowing their backyard is termed Jesus. particularly, the confusion happens whilst some dufus who's by no ability afflicted to truthfully study the Bible mixes the judgmental psycho deity of the OT with the NT character of Jesus. they're going to say issues like 'the OT now no longer counts' then turn proper around and quote Leviticus on their interpretation of what Leviticus says approximately homosexuality. None look to comprehend that the sole factor Jesus himself says is undesirable, is divorce. The Corinthians quote that lists homosexuality alongside with divorce and promiscuity as a sin? which would be Paul. @ hassle-unfastened, newsflash, some people don't have a cloak Matthew 19:21 'in case you prefer to be proper, sell your issues and supply them to the adverse' @ spider boy, are you truthfully daft sufficient to think of the conflict with Iran became into shielding? The conflict with Afghanistan is often argued that it became into preemptive, no longer shielding. @ jim, are you touching on the OT verse, an eye fixed for an eye fixed, a tooth for a tooth? as I reported... eye roll @ enormous one, you're one to be talking approximately twisting scripture @ michael d, for the reason which you haven't any longer something of any interest to make a contribution, you attack the questioner...you should save on with your very own advice and basically no longer answer @ cate, I do savor R. Paul's stance on no longer interfering yet he additionally needs to eliminate social welfare classes...that is not very 'professional-existence' to tension a financially or mentally careworn man or woman to have a new child and then refuse to help it out in existence. @ anthony, awaken...jesus reported no longer something approximately homosexuality or abortion...those words weren't even invented yet!
No one is Pro war silly liberal.
The best passage from the Bible on that subject, since Jesus didn't address it directly, is John the Baptist telling a Roman soldier to treat his enemy fairly. He did not tell the Roman soldier to get out of the army.
Why do you ask only republicans? Democrats are also christians and Democrats are also war mongers. Just look at past wars and conflicts we have been in
If I knew how to do it, I would vote for Happy Cat as the best answer.
Jesus was a pacifist. Republicans would hate him if he were preaching today.
Edit--“Bless them that curse you, and pray for them which despitefully use you.
And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloak forbid not to take thy coat also.
Give to every man that asketh of thee; and of him that taketh away thy goods ask them not again.” Luke 6:28-30
Jesus who? Are you referring to my gardener, Jesus Gonzalez?
Jesus was not anti war.
He was for turning the other cheak.
But not being a *****. Jesus was not a *****.
Who exactly is pro-war?