Just for my benefit, I'm going to change notation into Java syntax:
A and B = A && B
A or B = A || B
not A = !A
1 = TRUE
0 = FALSE
Good, now, I'm going to inject some parentheses into it to clarify the order in which we're going to approach it. That means our expression is now:
((!A && B) || (A && !B)) || (A && !D) || ((A && D) && !(TRUE || B && D))
Notice this is a string of three OR statements. Thus for it to be TRUE, only one of the three needs to be TRUE.
I'm going to start with the last of the three:
(A && D) && !(TRUE || B && D)
And the second half of that:
TRUE || B && D
This is always TRUE, regardless of B&&D, since it's an OR.
But this statement is negated by a NOT. NOT TRUE is FALSE. So now we have:
(A && D) && FALSE
This now always FALSE, regardless of A&&D because just one of the statements is FALSE always.
Now we have:
((!A && B) || (A && !B)) || (A && !D) || FALSE
We can now eliminate that last part since it's always FALSE:
((!A && B) || (A && !B)) || (A && !D)
Now let's look at the first part:
(!A && B) || (A && !B)
This is TRUE as long as A and B are opposite. If they're the same, it's FALSE. Now, if this were coding, I would say:
A != B
But I don't think Boolean algebra tends to make use of that. Otherwise, I think just leave it as-is, but I'm going to do a bit more of the problem using A!=B.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
Just for my benefit, I'm going to change notation into Java syntax:
A and B = A && B
A or B = A || B
not A = !A
1 = TRUE
0 = FALSE
Good, now, I'm going to inject some parentheses into it to clarify the order in which we're going to approach it. That means our expression is now:
((!A && B) || (A && !B)) || (A && !D) || ((A && D) && !(TRUE || B && D))
Notice this is a string of three OR statements. Thus for it to be TRUE, only one of the three needs to be TRUE.
I'm going to start with the last of the three:
(A && D) && !(TRUE || B && D)
And the second half of that:
TRUE || B && D
This is always TRUE, regardless of B&&D, since it's an OR.
But this statement is negated by a NOT. NOT TRUE is FALSE. So now we have:
(A && D) && FALSE
This now always FALSE, regardless of A&&D because just one of the statements is FALSE always.
Now we have:
((!A && B) || (A && !B)) || (A && !D) || FALSE
We can now eliminate that last part since it's always FALSE:
((!A && B) || (A && !B)) || (A && !D)
Now let's look at the first part:
(!A && B) || (A && !B)
This is TRUE as long as A and B are opposite. If they're the same, it's FALSE. Now, if this were coding, I would say:
A != B
But I don't think Boolean algebra tends to make use of that. Otherwise, I think just leave it as-is, but I'm going to do a bit more of the problem using A!=B.
The middle can't be simplified.
(A != B) || (A && !D)
So, this is true when:
A, B, !D
A, !B, D
A, !B, !D
!A, B, D
!A, B, !D
!A, !B, D
And false when:
A, B, D
!A, !B, !D