Today at 9 pm I get a knock at my door and when I open 3 police barge in without asking me permission. They then proceed to twll me to sign this paper to search. When I ask for a warrent the cop says " You really dont want to do that it wont be fun for you" so I was forced to sign the paper. They apparently were looking for a LARGE sum of Marijuana but I only had 2 small cigar blunts. I do not deal and they acted as if I was Tony Montana and acting as if I was lying. After tesring apart my place they find only the 2 cigars thst I GAVE THEM AND SAID IT WAS ALL. Then they proceed to question me and search my car (the letter stated only my apartment nothing about car). They kept asking me if I sold and I said no. They gave me a suoms and must meet with the DA in the upcoming months. I wad wondering is there anythig I could say to the DA. The cops were very confused looking and somewhat angry when they only found the 2 cigar blunts. I am a full time college student who has mid terms and I can not drink so I occasianally smoke but not often. I feel violated and pissed at the cops because I feel like I was search unlawfully. Please respond with no hate. Thank you.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
Frankly, this sounds like someone reported you and let the police to think you may be dealing.
The search did yield marijuana though, so that may justify the search. However, with the way it was all handled that may get thrown out.
To my innovations that's questionable. First, I doubt that there became into any foundation for demanding evidence of registration. 2nd, as quickly because it became into desperate that the registration became into valid and the object became into an airsoft gun, and to that end became into no longer a hid handgun, there became into no foundation for any extra detention. 0.33, on the grounds that there became into no foundation for an arrest, a pat down could have been criminal purely with a smart suspicion that the detained guy or woman became into armed and unsafe (and that i do no longer think of an airsoft interior the glove field is sufficient). yet a criminal professional with get admission to to the police checklist would have lots greater proper perception into this than I do. BTW, seek regulation in California is purely federal--California regulation would not independently furnish for suppression of illegally seized evidence. upload: The glove field became into opened in line with the officer's call for to work out registration. If the driving force became into unlawfully detained at that factor, or if the call for for registration became into unlawful, then the view of the airsoft (and each little thing that observed) became into no longer lawful, although the officer did no longer himself open the field. And no count what the legality of something that went before, the intense police action became into the pat down, which nonetheless seems unjustified to me below Terry v. Ohio. ADD2: Dylan is almost impressive. If a guy or woman has an identical opinion to a police intrusion, there is not any violation. although, if that consent is won on an identical time as the guy is illegally detained, or if that consent is won by utilising the exploitation of a prior illegality, the quest remains unlawful. At any fee, I see no longer something interior the reported info indicating that the pat down became into consensual, and the pat down is the intense think approximately this situation.
You should never have signed thst paper get yourself an attourney have them present at da office on the mean time become familiar with the us constitution
Quit smokin' dude, you are getting delusional and paranoid.