The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has stated:
A judicial precedent attaches a specific legal consequence to a detailed set of facts in an adjudged case or judicial decision, which is then considered as furnishing the rule for the determination of a subsequent case involving identical or similar material facts and arising in the same court or a lower court in the judicial hierarchy. Basically what the first guy said.
In law, a precedent or authority is a legal case establishing a principle or rule that a court may need to adopt when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts.
If a judge has previously made a decision on an issue, and something similar comes up again later, the new judge will often respect the former's decision. He's not obliged to do so if he disagrees, but generally will - to keep justice consistent.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has stated:
A judicial precedent attaches a specific legal consequence to a detailed set of facts in an adjudged case or judicial decision, which is then considered as furnishing the rule for the determination of a subsequent case involving identical or similar material facts and arising in the same court or a lower court in the judicial hierarchy. Basically what the first guy said.
In law, a precedent or authority is a legal case establishing a principle or rule that a court may need to adopt when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts.
If a judge has previously made a decision on an issue, and something similar comes up again later, the new judge will often respect the former's decision. He's not obliged to do so if he disagrees, but generally will - to keep justice consistent.
Its a decision made in a higher court, which must be followed by the lower courts when similar cases arise
Are studyin g for an LLB or US or australian or newzealand Law
it varies babe!!!!!