It seems like the girls with a small waist to hip ratio are the ones most concerned about clothes, money, and this stupid sh** called game. However, girls with the large waist to hip ratio (plus sized girls) seem to not care about any of these things and just seem to be a lot less discriminatory in general when it comes to choosing someone to date. I personally think what's under the clothes matters more than the clothes themselves (just speaking logically). I also assert that a woman should look only for a man who has enough $ to take care of himself and pay for the dates; he shouldn't have to be able to pay for her hair and nails to get done or buy her diamond rings or whatever. Finally, game is lame; it's just lies and plots to make her think he's something he's not. Then again, why would a female want a playboy who might know how to have a good time but also knows how to play her for a fool, cheat, screw her emotions, and knock her up and leave her with a child to rear up herself and an irresponsible sperm donor. What's wrong with a nice, hardworking, educated, loyal, trustworthy guy with backbone, confidence, and a great future who may be a little lame, boring, and inexperienced? Do we really deserve the hot girl after her emotions are shot, she's giver her best to the worst, she has a lot of fatherless kids, and thus we get the sloppy seconds with the hard core c**k blocker attitude?
Update:point is why must girls fall for game? I mean can't ya'll just take the man for who he is and look a lil' more deeply? Can you not put up with a boring/lame guy who's great otherwise and work with him to rectify these few minor problems so that you can have a promising future with a man? Good things are worth working for ya know. It's funny how women will put up with/try to change the more troublesome problems of the bad boy before they even attempt to rectify the minor more feasible problems with the good guy. PLEASE READ AND COMPREHEND THE ENTIRE QUESTION BEFORE RESPONDING!!!
Update 3:point is why must girls fall for game? I mean can't ya'll just take the man for who he is and look a lil' more deeply? Can you not put up with a boring/lame guy who's great otherwise and work with him to rectify these few minor problems so that you can have a promising future with a man? Good things are worth working for ya know. It's funny how women will put up with/try to change the more troublesome problems of the bad boy before they even attempt to rectify the minor more feasible problems with the good guy. PLEASE READ AND COMPREHEND THE ENTIRE QUESTION BEFORE RESPONDING!!!
Answers & Comments
Well, when you are among the best you can expect the best.
Note: If a man has to lie to play the "game" he's not a true player after all. That's why women want to see what a man has instead of hearing about what he's got.
Basically better looking girls r usually aware of how they look and are therefore more likely to believe they can do better in addition biggers girls tend not to get anyone and so therefore will take who ever they want thats basically the shallow answer
the more realistic reason is better looking people tend to actually be more successful in life
Well when you are young and looking for a potential partner you don't know what is the best option and this goes for both males and females.
Because they know they're attractive. It's the same with good looking men,
Not true, stop with the stereotypes. Why are you chasing them? Are you shallow too?