Most of the worlds men are natural. That allows people to have natural sex, the way we evolved to have it. Circumcision is a weird thing -- a cutting off of the main male pleasure zones. This is tons of pleasure giving nerves, blood vessels, protective covering and pleasure zones. The dynamics of the penis is changed for good. A woman that says she likes cut men is no better than a man that says he likes cut women (circumcised women typically have had their clitoral hood and labia cut off). This is serious genital modification (mutilation) of the male with more nerves cut than female circumcision. It does lead men to want oral and anal more, because vaginal sex is less satisfying after the cut of these parts. Cut men have more premature ejaculation issues as the scar is now the most sensitive part and they have lost control of orgasm timing. It leads to sexual dysfunction at a young age. The cut men in thr world use most of the VIAGRA consumed.
The concept of a preference for a man that has lost part of his penis and capacity for pleasure via circumcision is really outrageous. If it is a matter of looks (even though they look about the same erect) or the hygiene myth (a cut up penis is no cleaner than a natural one), that is trivial compared to a human having the chance to experience the pleasures and sexual function that these parts provide.
BTW, women tend to care about the guy as a whole. When they get one they like, they really have no issue about the goods, unless there is some wired issue. In the US natural (what you call uncirc) vs cut is not a big isse, but women are finding out about natural being better, so that may change.
So people are STUPID just because they have a different preference or because they aren't superficial like you? If I said something like that about any part on a natural woman's body, you'd think I was being a sexist pig. What a hypocrite you are. Do us all a favor and GROW UP!
There are a lot of reason why people are against circumcision now (we have a lot more information about now than we did before thanks to the internet). But whether you are for it or against it calling someone else stupid because their opinion is different from yours is the mark of an immature person who wouldn't know reason if it walked up to them and slapped them in the forehead.
I think you are limited by your own experiences. Have you ever even been with a guy who wasn't circumcised before? I have and I actually prefer it for a variety of reasons. For most people it's not all about "looks". Personally, I don't think any penis looks all that great. They are meant to be functional, not aesthetic. All I'm saying is don't knock it till you've tried it. Either way, I agree with the last poster: it's not stupid just because people have different preferences than you.
Most of the females in the world obviously prefer a non-circumcised male, as more than 80% of the males in the world are not circumcised.
Circumcision is genital mutilation, which always damages sexual feeling, function and ability.
It's illegal to circumcise female minors, and it should be for males as well, as genital mutilation is genital mutilation, regardless of the sex of the victim.
You wouldn't find a foreskin to look "gross" if you had been brought up in a part of the world, such as Europe, Scandinavia, South America or most of Asia, where circumcision is considered a gross mutilation of the penis. They find that the circumcised penis looks mutilated and scarred, which it is.
Circumcision is a fraud and a hoax.
A foreskin is not a birth defect; it is a birthright.
I'm a woman who prefers uncircumcised. I think it's not right to circumcise a baby. I think he should be left to choose if he wants that done. It's his body.
I am a woman who much prefers uncircumcised. They are much better than circumcised.
My reasons:
Circumcised penises are scarred, discoloured (the head of the penis is lighter than the shaft) less sensitive, the head of the penis gets dry, you have to use lube with a circumcised penis, its less fun.
My present uncircumcised man arrived after I'd been with several circumcised men.
I have had no relations with circumcised men since I met my current uncircumcised lover, but the difference between circd sex and uncircd sex is very obvious to me.
All my circumcised men seemed too anxious to reach their own orgasms and too caught up in getting their own pleasure. And they often left me unsatisfied, leaving me irritable, aggravated, and frustrated as hell.
Circumcised men are more rough and they tend to ‘pound away’ at me. With them, I seldom achieved orgasm.
During circumcised intercourse, it always felt like there were two sexual experiences going on—his and mine. It was never making love—it was only ‘F...ing.’ And most of the time our movements were out of sync. I was often left frustrated and feeling used
—leaving me feeling blue.
My uncircumcised man is very tender, passionate, and loving. Sex is more relaxed, mellow, and gentle with him than it was with circumcised men.
My uncircd man takes more time. I could make love with him for hours (and sometimes do). He is softer and gentler than the circumcised ones were. During circumcised intercourse, my noises and utterings sounded painful because it was close to painful at times! With my uncircd lover, they are more cooing, purring, and sounds of contentment, in response to the pleasure I'm feeling.
My uncircumcised partner is more sensitive, but I tend to think it is because he has a natural penis—hence, he is more delicate—he is more in touch with his penis—and his penis is more in touch with his heart.
When my uncircumcised man is inside me, he moves more smoothly, more gently, which is what I need.
Also, a natural penis feels more filling and seems to have an extra gliding sensation inside me. My current uncircd lover is usually in close physical contact with me, adding to the feeling of intimacy.
I usually have multiple orgasms with my uncircd partner that I didn't have with circumcised partners. My uncircd man gives me more frequent, powerful, all-encompassing orgasms. On a scale of 1-10, my natural orgasms rate a 12.
With my uncircd partner, I can relax and enjoy, knowing it will lead to orgasm.
After intercourse with my uncircd partner, I am much more relaxed, peaceful, fulfilled—brimming over with contentment. Bedtime sex often leaves me purring in my sleep and needing an early morning quickie before we get up. The afterglow can last for most of the day, making me horny for him that night.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
Most of the worlds men are natural. That allows people to have natural sex, the way we evolved to have it. Circumcision is a weird thing -- a cutting off of the main male pleasure zones. This is tons of pleasure giving nerves, blood vessels, protective covering and pleasure zones. The dynamics of the penis is changed for good. A woman that says she likes cut men is no better than a man that says he likes cut women (circumcised women typically have had their clitoral hood and labia cut off). This is serious genital modification (mutilation) of the male with more nerves cut than female circumcision. It does lead men to want oral and anal more, because vaginal sex is less satisfying after the cut of these parts. Cut men have more premature ejaculation issues as the scar is now the most sensitive part and they have lost control of orgasm timing. It leads to sexual dysfunction at a young age. The cut men in thr world use most of the VIAGRA consumed.
The concept of a preference for a man that has lost part of his penis and capacity for pleasure via circumcision is really outrageous. If it is a matter of looks (even though they look about the same erect) or the hygiene myth (a cut up penis is no cleaner than a natural one), that is trivial compared to a human having the chance to experience the pleasures and sexual function that these parts provide.
BTW, women tend to care about the guy as a whole. When they get one they like, they really have no issue about the goods, unless there is some wired issue. In the US natural (what you call uncirc) vs cut is not a big isse, but women are finding out about natural being better, so that may change.
So people are STUPID just because they have a different preference or because they aren't superficial like you? If I said something like that about any part on a natural woman's body, you'd think I was being a sexist pig. What a hypocrite you are. Do us all a favor and GROW UP!
There are a lot of reason why people are against circumcision now (we have a lot more information about now than we did before thanks to the internet). But whether you are for it or against it calling someone else stupid because their opinion is different from yours is the mark of an immature person who wouldn't know reason if it walked up to them and slapped them in the forehead.
I think you are limited by your own experiences. Have you ever even been with a guy who wasn't circumcised before? I have and I actually prefer it for a variety of reasons. For most people it's not all about "looks". Personally, I don't think any penis looks all that great. They are meant to be functional, not aesthetic. All I'm saying is don't knock it till you've tried it. Either way, I agree with the last poster: it's not stupid just because people have different preferences than you.
Function is much more important than "looks."
Most of the females in the world obviously prefer a non-circumcised male, as more than 80% of the males in the world are not circumcised.
Circumcision is genital mutilation, which always damages sexual feeling, function and ability.
It's illegal to circumcise female minors, and it should be for males as well, as genital mutilation is genital mutilation, regardless of the sex of the victim.
You wouldn't find a foreskin to look "gross" if you had been brought up in a part of the world, such as Europe, Scandinavia, South America or most of Asia, where circumcision is considered a gross mutilation of the penis. They find that the circumcised penis looks mutilated and scarred, which it is.
Circumcision is a fraud and a hoax.
A foreskin is not a birth defect; it is a birthright.
ERIC
I'm a woman who prefers uncircumcised. I think it's not right to circumcise a baby. I think he should be left to choose if he wants that done. It's his body.
I am a woman who much prefers uncircumcised. They are much better than circumcised.
My reasons:
Circumcised penises are scarred, discoloured (the head of the penis is lighter than the shaft) less sensitive, the head of the penis gets dry, you have to use lube with a circumcised penis, its less fun.
My present uncircumcised man arrived after I'd been with several circumcised men.
I have had no relations with circumcised men since I met my current uncircumcised lover, but the difference between circd sex and uncircd sex is very obvious to me.
All my circumcised men seemed too anxious to reach their own orgasms and too caught up in getting their own pleasure. And they often left me unsatisfied, leaving me irritable, aggravated, and frustrated as hell.
Circumcised men are more rough and they tend to ‘pound away’ at me. With them, I seldom achieved orgasm.
During circumcised intercourse, it always felt like there were two sexual experiences going on—his and mine. It was never making love—it was only ‘F...ing.’ And most of the time our movements were out of sync. I was often left frustrated and feeling used
—leaving me feeling blue.
My uncircumcised man is very tender, passionate, and loving. Sex is more relaxed, mellow, and gentle with him than it was with circumcised men.
My uncircd man takes more time. I could make love with him for hours (and sometimes do). He is softer and gentler than the circumcised ones were. During circumcised intercourse, my noises and utterings sounded painful because it was close to painful at times! With my uncircd lover, they are more cooing, purring, and sounds of contentment, in response to the pleasure I'm feeling.
My uncircumcised partner is more sensitive, but I tend to think it is because he has a natural penis—hence, he is more delicate—he is more in touch with his penis—and his penis is more in touch with his heart.
When my uncircumcised man is inside me, he moves more smoothly, more gently, which is what I need.
Also, a natural penis feels more filling and seems to have an extra gliding sensation inside me. My current uncircd lover is usually in close physical contact with me, adding to the feeling of intimacy.
I usually have multiple orgasms with my uncircd partner that I didn't have with circumcised partners. My uncircd man gives me more frequent, powerful, all-encompassing orgasms. On a scale of 1-10, my natural orgasms rate a 12.
With my uncircd partner, I can relax and enjoy, knowing it will lead to orgasm.
After intercourse with my uncircd partner, I am much more relaxed, peaceful, fulfilled—brimming over with contentment. Bedtime sex often leaves me purring in my sleep and needing an early morning quickie before we get up. The afterglow can last for most of the day, making me horny for him that night.
.
Circ sucks which is why foreskin regeneration is comming at foregen