What is the wwe doing? Undertaker gets screwed over for 2 years straight in title matches and jeff hardy manages to beat edge the first time?
So edge beats undertaker about 25 times and jeff beats edge. Jeff pwns undertaker? Sorry but wtf are they doing i know this happens all the time but does anyone seriously think Jeff Hardy deserves the title just because he's been there for so long? Kane could rip jeff apart and kane only had his title for a day. Jeff has already had a longer title reign then Kane and thats the Kane that didn't suck. Who else shares my loathing of the WWE and its horid writers.
Update:idk whats going on in tna as its a 3rd world show. but talking about -the truth- is better then saying its ok to do drugs because in the end you always win anyway, wtf? I get why 'taker is off and i know all that, what i don't know is why they are pushing Hardy, a drug addict who is for some reason allowed to be the role model for young children and teenagers alike... its a bad role model and he's aimed at the kids, not all wrestlers are aimed at the kids, he on the other hand, is aimed at drug addicts, children that like his high flying and 'i am my own person' attitude and they let him win because kids like him, which is bad because that means the WWE is saying its ok to do drugs see hardy did drugs and he's the champ.
BTW not all triple threat matches are no dq, i didn't realize that title match was no dq, guess thats the only way hardy can win a world title right?
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
undertaker got screwed over two years straight? other than when he won the title and had it for a few months?
the reason undertaker was screwed is simple... it added to the feud between them. the undertaker takes on more than he should for a man in his physical condition and for all the breaks his body needs... he has to be cheated because that's one of the few believable ways the undertaker can lose.
the interference is all legal in a triple threat match as they are no DQ.
Jeff has earned his place at the top like it or not he is over with the fans and thats just as important as wrestling skills.
I find it really funny you are complaining about someone winning a title when in TNA Kurt angle is talking about Jill Jarret dying and Jeff's children... are you saying Jeff Hardy winning the title is worse than talking about someones dead wife?
the booking of jeff winning the title wasn't horid it was perfectly acceptable even if you don't agree with it.
undertaker has arthritis in his knees,which is causing him a lot of pain.He cant wrestle every night like he used to,which is why he isn't holding a title.Defending it demands a lot on his body,and he cant give it now.
as for Jeff,are you serious? Jeff deserves that damn belt.Hes busted hi *** to earn a chance at that belt.No one,NO ONE,can honestly tell me Jeff has not earned that belt.
why the hell cant any of ya haters just enjoy the show for what it is? why do you have to try and kill any sense of enjoyment people get? Its wrestling man,not life and death.Lighten up.
I disagree I think Jeff Hardy deserved to win
Totally agree with you that bull SH*t nice question i just realized that starred for sure homie