it is form of limiting in basic terms to have 2 concepts. Edward de Bono (Lateral questioning) stated that there could be a nil.33, "po", which stands for issues like probably, postulate, think. this permits one to come again up with new solutions to previous questions. "Does God exist? definite or no?" "Po God exists. Then how does that impact us? Does it make any difference to how we live our prevalent lives? Does prayer artwork?" lots extra efficient than coming to blows over the definite and no concepts.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
I go with yes, for it means the mind is more open to possibilities instead of being shut off from the unknown
it is form of limiting in basic terms to have 2 concepts. Edward de Bono (Lateral questioning) stated that there could be a nil.33, "po", which stands for issues like probably, postulate, think. this permits one to come again up with new solutions to previous questions. "Does God exist? definite or no?" "Po God exists. Then how does that impact us? Does it make any difference to how we live our prevalent lives? Does prayer artwork?" lots extra efficient than coming to blows over the definite and no concepts.
I will go with yes, because if I were not alive, the answer would be given to me.
Niether I will go with maybe, there is a possibility at each corner
neither, i choose the right