Verified answer

Not this deal. You're right Lackey will get you more wins. But you will be losing a lot of value with the type of production that can come from Soriano. If you want Lackey over Zambrano perhaps counter-offer them straight-up of get a real good hitter off of the other guy to fit your team needs.

Terrible deal. Both Zambrano and Soriano are going to come around, and Lackey won't last. If you're getting the better end of this, I'd jump on it, but if you're GETTING Lackey, no way.

the person getting soriano and zambrano are the getting the better end of this deal. no way lackey is going to keep up what hes doing now. hope this helps.

This is a great deal for you if your the one giving up lackey. If your the one trading zambrano and soriano your crazy. hope this helps.

NL hitters: i think of that David Wright and Albert Pujols are somewhat severe, yet otherwise curiously fantastically sturdy. NL pitchers: i think of that Roy Oswalt is overvalued same with Zambrano, and Chris youthful could circulate up somewhat. AL Hitters: David Ortiz is overvalued same with a .270 hitting Grady Sizemore. you're able to upload Joe Mauer on your checklist, final years AL batting champ. Manny Ramirez is a ways overvalued, and as much as I hate to declare this Derek Jeter could circulate up on the checklist notably. AL Pitchers: little question that Santana is quantity a million and becket #2. Erik Bedard isn't any greater advantageous than Halladay, Haren, Wang, and Verlander. i might upload Francisco Liriano. Your checklist are sturdy, those are in user-friendly terms some transformations i might make.

For the person giving up Lackey...

with a trade like that you should be getting etiher Peavy or Santana.....not Lackey

Hellz naw!

i think youll be giving up to much maybe you should make him add more to the trade