Verified answer

I think Edward because his more moden and doesn't have as many problems like dracula, his only major flaw is not being able to go out in the sunlight.

Dracula: Pros- King of all Vampires, hypnosis, shape-shifting, brain-washing, people fear him, super strength, some legends say werewolves (or wolves) work for him, has no reflection (sneak up on people), floats, can call mist, can turn into mist

Cons- Burns in Sunlight, can be killed by stake through the heart, and cannot travel over moving water without being in a coffin filled with soil from his land of birth, hates the smell of garlic, has no reflection ( can be id as a vampire)

Edward: Pros- Doesn't burn in sunlight, lighting fast speed, mind-reading, can't be killed by a stake, can handle the smell of garlic, super strength, can travel over moving water with out coffin filled with soil (maybe)

Cons- high school kid, sparkles in sun light, emotional when he thinks he's not, has a werewolf that hates him, sparkles in sunlight, not very bright when it comes to relationships

nicely.. i think of that's a diverse element, the two are fictitious characters, the version is that Dracula replaced into outfitted in step with a historic character, and has harvested recognition and legend in the process the final 2 centuries, whilst Edward Cullen is a fictitious character, you need to call it "modern-day romantic" terror character and is set in a diverse time and diverse situations, it is like evaluating David Bowie to Zach Efron (LOL). One is a famous person with content cloth and history, the different is extra mainstream poppish teenage taking photos famous person. :3 yet yea I particularly Dracula. lolol---

Dracula and Edward are both good at hiding their emotions but Dracula is more rational than emotional. Dracula is truly "soulless" the way Edward thinks he is.

Dracula has the whole hypnosis thing going, something that seems to be missing in modern vampires.

One is the king of all vampires and one is an effeminate high school predator.