Gibson Les Paul Standard or Studio?

I recently got an Epiphone Special II (my second guitar) because my mom won a contest and gave the guitar to me, and I found out that I love the Les Paul style guitars. But the thing is, that's kind of a beginner guitar and I'm not a beginner guitarist anymore. I've looked around at Guitar Center, Sam Ash, and a bunch of other various guitar shops, and have pretty much decided that I want a Les Paul Studio rather than a Standard. Simply because, since 1. I am paying for the guitar, am only 14, and can't get a job yet, that saves me a good few years of money-saving. and 2. I don't see too many differences important to me in between the standard and the studio.

So my question is, do you think I should go with the studio or standard? I'm leaning towards the studio, but I'm not sure. And also, if I get the studio, there's a limited edition faded line that apparently is the exact same guitar, but with a different finish, and therefore, a lot cheaper. I talked to the people at Guitar Center and that's what they said. Here is a link: http://www.guitarcenter.com/Gibson-Les-Paul-Studio... (The satin black and faded cherry are the ones I'm most interested in. And also, I can't decide on the color: red or black? Or do you think I should just pay more money and buy a new normal finish, or a used normal finish? The new ones come with a hard case, and I would definitely need one, and they generally don't come with used guitars, right?)

Update:

I'm not really worried about scratching the guitar, I'm generally a pretty careful person and besides, I think scratches give guitars character, and they show that they've been loved and such. Plus they can look cool. I'd just rather not spend $500 more for a shiny finish when I can get the exact same guitar with a faded finish for a lot less.

Please enter comments
Please enter your name.
Please enter the correct email address.
You must agree before submitting.

Answers & Comments


Helpful Social

Copyright © 2024 Q2A.ES - All rights reserved.