Verified answer

>"I have found on the web many photos of artifacts that people made that have pictures of dinosaurs on them ..."

Then it should be no problem giving us a few links?

How do we comment on these artifacts based on nothing but your description?

First of all, it is an absolutely unequivocal scientific fact that dinosaurs and humans never coexisted. These two species of animals are separated by at least 65 million years.

Now, this statement is not true because the textbooks say it's true - this statement is true because there is a mountain of evidence, collected by thousands of scientists, all over the world, over the last few centuries, that says it's true.

Photos on the web could be real or they could be faked. If you have questions about photos you find on the web, you have to ask yourself, "what's more likely?"

Is it more likely that

1) these photos of people chasing dinosaurs with spears were faked, or

2) the animals the people were chasing in these photos were misinterpreted (either ignorantly or intentionally) as dinosaurs when they were actually mammals, or

3) that there are some cave photos that you found on the internet that refute centuries of scientific evidence and theories, that no other scientists have found yet?

What's more likely? I think the clear answer is either 1 or 2.

"Would those be all fakes? or could it be possible some of them aren't?"

None of them are fakes and none of them are of dinosaurs...

people also drew a lot of dragons, unicorns, griffins, chimera, sasquatch, lake monsters, pixies, sirens, trolls, and elves ... are they real too?