My article has not been deleted past 14 days,
it was not like speedy deletion like before,
there is still has a message
"reliable, secondary sources"
how can I provide my article?
and Secondary Sources definition is not quiet obvious,
Update:Gaul
thanks for speedy answer,
well, i just check on Schlor google but there is 0 hits yet,
how can i use this for i need more guidance
Copyright © 2024 Q2A.ES - All rights reserved.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
Linking the article in question would help a lot.
Generally, you'd have to look up publications related to the subject, and cite them as sources at the appropriate statements and statistics. http://scholar.google.hu/ can help with gathering sources, that's what I use for the first round.
Best of luck!
i visit furnish you with 2 information about Wikipedia, and in the experience that they don't assist in making up your concepts, then you definitely might want to properly be previous the help of adults. Taner Akcam. have you ever heard of him? he's an author and professor who teaches about Turkey's position in Armenia. He has political warring parties global who carry extra nationalistic perspectives of Turkey. faster or later, Akcam replaced into flying from Minnesota to Montreal, to furnish a lecture at a school there. He ignored the lecture because he replaced into detained for 4 hours contained in the airport. Why? Airport protection looked him up on Wikipedia and they study that Taner Akcam replaced into in contact with terrorist businesses. even nonetheless this replaced into pretend advice maliciously entered into Wikipedia, Akcam's civil rights were violated. it is yet another actuality. The Wikipedia article about Jackson, Michigan at present corrected slightly of incorrect information about Abraham Lincoln. the object had suggested that Lincoln attended the first convention of the Republican social gathering, in Jackson. the aspect is, Lincoln in undemanding words ever visited Michigan once in his existence, and it replaced right into a visit to Kalamazoo and had no longer something to do with the convention in Jackson. guess how lengthy this mistake persevered in Wikipedia? a couple of minutes? an afternoon or 2? a week? No, the mistakes replaced into in position for 600 days, Peace-heart. it is why you're a fool in case you imagine Wikipedia, through itself, must be considered a sturdy source of advice.