This is Gulbis because he's a better performer in big situations. He made it to the quarters of the French and gave Djokovic (who was the 2nd best clay courter the entire tournament) a real fight. He also was the only other person that took a set from Nadal at Wimbledon (the other being Federer obviously).
That's where he seperates himself from Del Potro. He's a better big game player. Del Potro's victories have all come at lower level events. If he wins a master's series or Grand Slam then it might be different, but it's Gulbis. He can play on all courts
gulbis i think del potro is only good at clay courts but gulbis is good at every surface i think so thats why i choose gulbis but i also think that marin cilic will be up there to
neither, probably gulbis as he has weapons with his whole game, however potro will fizzle out as a clay court specialist coz he ain't that good, Gulbis is good but needs a good guidance and direction with his game coz at the moment he just tries to smack everyball as hard as he can hoping it will go in for a winner.
Just because im right people have to give me a thumbs down. I bet you any money, iwas right about andy and im right about this.
i think gulbis 'cause del potro also has a lot of potencial but he already has back problems at such a young age and that's gonna influence a lot in his carrer, like it did in guga's , but i hope i'm wrong
juan martin del potro. i can see much more potential in him. if he keeps improving and stays injury free, he'll be in the top 10 within the next few years
No, yet he substitute into on the Serena vs Clijsters interest. He tried to flow on the court docket after the adventure, yet after Serena argued the foot fault and have been given ejected, he purely did no longer locate it to be the awesome time.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
This is Gulbis because he's a better performer in big situations. He made it to the quarters of the French and gave Djokovic (who was the 2nd best clay courter the entire tournament) a real fight. He also was the only other person that took a set from Nadal at Wimbledon (the other being Federer obviously).
That's where he seperates himself from Del Potro. He's a better big game player. Del Potro's victories have all come at lower level events. If he wins a master's series or Grand Slam then it might be different, but it's Gulbis. He can play on all courts
Gulbis.
gulbis i think del potro is only good at clay courts but gulbis is good at every surface i think so thats why i choose gulbis but i also think that marin cilic will be up there to
neither, probably gulbis as he has weapons with his whole game, however potro will fizzle out as a clay court specialist coz he ain't that good, Gulbis is good but needs a good guidance and direction with his game coz at the moment he just tries to smack everyball as hard as he can hoping it will go in for a winner.
Just because im right people have to give me a thumbs down. I bet you any money, iwas right about andy and im right about this.
i think gulbis 'cause del potro also has a lot of potencial but he already has back problems at such a young age and that's gonna influence a lot in his carrer, like it did in guga's , but i hope i'm wrong
juan martin del potro. i can see much more potential in him. if he keeps improving and stays injury free, he'll be in the top 10 within the next few years
No, yet he substitute into on the Serena vs Clijsters interest. He tried to flow on the court docket after the adventure, yet after Serena argued the foot fault and have been given ejected, he purely did no longer locate it to be the awesome time.
Gulbis, his game is good.
you already asked this question dude