Yes, if you define effencent as responding to the will of the voters. but since people are fickle ones that are less efficent where policies change slower may work better.
At least our unelected Prime Minister (and I do not see what all of the fuss is approximately there) isn't anyone who wields entire authority till such occasions as he's eliminated from the activity; the US President has the energy of veto on any laws he does not like. You can not actually feel that might be any form of advantage on what we've got bought. At least our man is area to balloting in Parliament, and he can not drive by way of laws towards trendy parliamentary competition. If proposals he does not like attain sufficient aid, he can not give up them simply by announcing no, both.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
Yes, if you define effencent as responding to the will of the voters. but since people are fickle ones that are less efficent where policies change slower may work better.
At least our unelected Prime Minister (and I do not see what all of the fuss is approximately there) isn't anyone who wields entire authority till such occasions as he's eliminated from the activity; the US President has the energy of veto on any laws he does not like. You can not actually feel that might be any form of advantage on what we've got bought. At least our man is area to balloting in Parliament, and he can not drive by way of laws towards trendy parliamentary competition. If proposals he does not like attain sufficient aid, he can not give up them simply by announcing no, both.