Pre-emptive war policy/Saving American lives?
Republicans established a precedent that it is acceptable to wage pre-emptive war. Could we save American lives by waging pre-emptive nuclear wars in the future, in order to keep our troops off the battlefield?
What country should we nuke first and how many megatons of nuclear explosives should be used? Also, do you think it is acceptable to nuke allies if we run out of axis countries to nuke? Could building up a newer, massive nuclear arsenal create industry, mining, and chemistry jobs that could help the economy?
Update:Also-- Maybe we could clean up the environment by taking spent fuel from power plants and making it into bombs? Or, if not, perhaps we could take the spent fuel and shoot a nuclear missile at it to get rid of it.
More Questions From This User See All
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
I understand your post and your frustrations at the misuse of American military power. Don't be discouraged. You have a president who seeks peaceful solutions. Do you think he won the Nobel peace prize for no reason. We have to hope the future will be sane, rational and without nuclear arms.
Ridiculous post . this is something the necon's would think up knowing once one nuke go off it will create a domino effect and no human will survived the fallout .
How about nuking the whole planet? Then we can avoid all future wars.