Verified answer

The person receiving Michael Beasley, Mo Williams, and Peja Stojakovic gets the better end of the deal because Michael Beasley rebounds a good amount each game and when Wade isn't in, he is Miami's go to guy. Mo Williams is the assist-man of the Cav's and he averages about 12 points a game which is decent. Peja Stojokavic is the 6th man of the Hornets and when his 3 point shot is on fire, he is unstoppable.

Danny Granger is good, but its better to have guys that give you numbers on all sides of the game that don't always start rather than having one guy who gives inconsistent numbers every game.

Granger for Beasley, Williams and Peja...

Who is Grangers compliments on that team? If its a weak team, I can see trading for an upgrade in 2 other positions while losing Grangers great all around game.

Trading away Beasley, Mo, and Peja... I hope youre running deeper in PG, SG and SF.

Who gets the better end? Whoever has the better overall team at the end of the trade. Granger is a nice upgrade over most players at the PF position, provided the team has help where Granger doesnt provide much.

Sorry I cant help more, but its the overall rosters that makes this deal work or fail.

Good luck either way.

Well normally I would say The guy who is getting the 3. But this happened to me last year i gave up Lebron for Corey Magette, Richard Hamilton and Kevin Durant. I though i was getting a good deal but then i didnt have enough room to play all of them. Id have nights where hamilton and Durant were on the bench cause i already had Rashard Lewis and Josh Howard. If you do not have many small forwards or any decent ones who ever gets the 3 is doing good but if u do who ever gets granger wins.

whoever is gettin the 3

whoever is getting granger is going to get the shaft.........hard