To make it short and sweet, I was interviewed for this position for the last 2 weeks or so, they are under a lot of stress (start-up) and basically need me to do HR and more. I was talking to the CEO the entire time and was offered the job by Email (job description , salary and all) and sent an acceptance letter. The CEO said he will send an official letter as soon as i accept the job an they needs me to start ASAP. now....its been 4 days since I accepted the job and no email. my question is...should I follow up with another letter? I am employed ATM, part time but I hate my job, so i'm worried my anxiety to leave might influence my judgment
Update:The reason I mentioned I will be doing HR is because they DON'T HAVE anyone doing it at the moment and its making my communication with them a big headache.
Copyright © 2024 Q2A.ES - All rights reserved.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
As an HR professional, I would think you would know how to handle this.
There is about a 1% chance that you will ever hear from them again.
- There job offer was via email, not over the phone? Is this a company you even want to work for?
- If they sent an email with a job offer, they expected you to reply and they didn't get a reply, they would contact you again. They haven't.
Obviously something changed between when they sent the email and when they got the reply. You may hate your job now, but I bet you would hate this job more.
convinced an enterprise can substitute an worker's interest call or demote you at any time for any reason. You were basically employed so i do no longer recommend asking them to compensate you. in case you do ask, you run the risk of having your interest provide withdrawn. in case you don't like your interest and make it standard to the enterprise, they're going to waste no time terminating you and replacing you with somebody else. At-will employment is a doctrine of yank regulation that defines an employment relationship in which both celebration can wreck the relationship without legal duty, presented there changed into no exhibit settlement for a unique time period governing the employment relationship and that the enterprise does no longer belong to a collective bargaining team (i.e., has no longer recognised a union). below this legal doctrine: “any hiring is presumed to be "at will"; it truly is, the enterprise is loose to discharge persons "for reliable reason, or undesirable reason, or no reason in any respect," and the worker is both loose to end, strike, or otherwise quit artwork.